เกมยิงปลาฟรี_โหลดสล็อต888_การนำทางหน้าเว็บ https://www.google.com//352/sujets/equite-salariale Thirty years ago the federal government passed a law making it illegal to discriminate against women in the workplace. But studies show that the wage gap is actually increasing. Women are still not receiving equal pay for work of equal value. PSAC continues to fight for our members¡¯ right to pay equity ¨C in workplaces ranging from the federal government, to Canada Post to a variety of private employers. en Projet de loi sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale : une ¨¦tape importante pour l¡¯¨¦galit¨¦ des femmes https://www.google.com//352/node/7162 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>L¡¯AFPC applaudit le nouveau projet de loi sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale du gouvernement Trudeau. C¡¯est une ¨¦tape importante pour l¡¯¨¦galit¨¦ des femmes.</p> <p>La loi fait de l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale un droit de la personne et oblige les employeurs ¨¤ ¨¦liminer toute discrimination salariale.</p> <p>Avec ce projet de loi, les longues batailles juridiques visant ¨¤ obtenir l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale sont choses du pass¨¦ puisque les employeurs devront, en collaboration avec les repr¨¦sentants des employ¨¦s, se doter de plans d¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale.</p> <p>L¡¯AFPC se r¨¦jouit que le projet de loi abroge la <em>Loi sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ dans la r¨¦mun¨¦ration du secteur public</em>, une loi adopt¨¦e par le Parti conservateur qui avait ¨¦limin¨¦ le droit ¨¤ l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale dans la fonction publique f¨¦d¨¦rale.</p> <p>L¡¯AFPC se r¨¦jouit aussi que le projet de loi?:</p> <ul><li>pr¨¦voit la cr¨¦ation d¡¯un nouveau commissariat, dot¨¦ des ressources n¨¦cessaires ¨¤ l¡¯ex¨¦cution de ses fonctions de surveillance et d¡¯application de la loi</li> <li>pr¨¦cise le calendrier de mise en ?uvre et les ¨¦ch¨¦anciers pour les examens obligatoires</li> <li>oblige les employeurs ¨¤ mettre de c?t¨¦ les fonds n¨¦cessaires pour combler les ¨¦carts salariaux.</li> </ul><p>L¡¯AFPC enjoint aux parlementaires d¡¯adopter ce projet de loi le plus rapidement possible. Il est temps de mettre fin ¨¤ la discrimination salariale au Canada!</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><div class="field field-name-field-publication-date field-type-datestamp field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Publication Date:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><span class="date-display-single">Tuesday, October 30, 2018 - 2:15pm</span></div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-embedded-image field-type-image field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Embedded Image:&nbsp;</h2><div class="field-items"><figure class="clearfix field-item even"><img class="image-style-none" src="/352/sites/psac/files/gettyimages-974657238_0.jpg" width="4368" height="2912" alt="" /></figure></div></section><div class="field field-name-field-image-placement field-type-list-text field-label-above view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Image Placement:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even">Top Right Half</div> </div> </div> Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:22:09 +0000 fonseca 7162 at/352 Pay equity legislation a milestone in advancing gender equality https://www.google.com//352/pay-equity-legislation-milestone-advancing-gender <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>PSAC welcomes the new federal proactive pay equity legislation introduced by the Trudeau government. It¡¯s an important milestone in advancing gender equality.</p> <p>The new law recognizes that pay equity is a human right and that employers have an obligation to eliminate gender-based discriminatory wage differences.</p> <p>This means 30-year legal battles to resolve pay equity complaints will become a thing of the past. Instead employers will be responsible for developing pay equity plans, and must do so with the equal participation of worker representatives.</p> <p>The legislation introduced also repeals the former Conservative government¡¯s Public Sector Equitable Compensation Act which took away key pay equity rights from workers in the federal public sector.</p> <p>PSAC is also pleased the legislation:</p> <ul><li>provides independent oversight and enforcement through a new Commissioner with the necessary resources to carry out their mandate.</li> <li>sets out timelines for implementation and compulsory reviews</li> <li>requires employers to set aside funds to eliminate any wage gaps</li> </ul><p>PSAC urges all parliamentarians to enact this legislation as quickly as possible. Women should not have to wait any longer to see the end of wage discrimination in Canada.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><div class="field field-name-field-publication-date field-type-datestamp field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Publication Date:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><span class="date-display-single">Tuesday, October 30, 2018 - 2:15pm</span></div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-embedded-image field-type-image field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Embedded Image:&nbsp;</h2><div class="field-items"><figure class="clearfix field-item even"><img class="image-style-none" src="/352/sites/psac/files/gettyimages-974657238.jpg" width="4368" height="2912" alt="" /></figure></div></section><div class="field field-name-field-image-placement field-type-list-text field-label-above view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Image Placement:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even">Top Right Half</div> </div> </div> Tue, 30 Oct 2018 18:20:53 +0000 fonseca 7161 at/352 ¨¦quit¨¦ salariale aux OES : victoire pour l¡¯AFPC et plus d¡¯argent pour les membres https://www.google.com//352/node/6866 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Le 13?juin 2018, l¡¯arbitre Joy Noonan a conclu que les personnes salari¨¦es, anciennes et actuelles, des Op¨¦rations des enqu¨ºtes statistiques (OES) vis¨¦es par le r¨¨glement sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale du 8?mars 1985 au 30?novembre 2013 recevront un paiement additionnel pour les cong¨¦s pay¨¦s qui n¡¯¨¦taient pas inclus dans leurs paiements initiaux d¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale.</p> <p>L¡¯arbitre a d¨¦termin¨¦ les pourcentages comme suit?:</p> <ul><li>8?% pour les personnes salari¨¦es des OES qui ont cess¨¦ de travailler pendant la p¨¦riode allant jusqu¡¯au 31?mars 2000 inclusivement;</li> <li>10?% pour les personnes salari¨¦es des OES qui ont cess¨¦ de travailler le 1<sup>er</sup>?avril 2000 ou apr¨¨s cette date.</li> </ul><p>L¡¯AFPC, qui r¨¦clamait des pourcentages plus ¨¦lev¨¦s, se r¨¦jouit quand m¨ºme car tous les membres actuels et anciens ayant droit ¨¤ l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale recevront tr¨¨s bient?t un paiement suppl¨¦mentaire.</p> <p>Les OES sont responsables d¡¯effectuer ces paiements suppl¨¦mentaires. Pour toute question ¨¤ cet ¨¦gard, veuillez communiquer avec les OES ¨¤ l¡¯adresse suivante?: <a href="mailto:statcan.ssopayequityoesequitesalariale.statcan@canada.ca">statcan.ssopayequityoesequitesalariale.statcan@canada.ca</a>.</p> <p>?</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section> Mon, 18 Jun 2018 20:01:43 +0000 calugaj 6866 at/352 PSAC wins additional compensation in SSO pay equity case https://www.google.com//352/psac-wins-additional-compensation-sso-pay-equity <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Arbitrator Joy Noonan ruled on June 13, 2018, that current and former Statistical Survey Operations (SSO) employees eligible for pay equity shall be entitled to additional compensation for paid leaves not included in SSO¡¯s initial pay equity payments.? Current and former SSO employees covered by the pay equity settlement from March 8, 1985, to Nov.?30, 2013, will be receiving an additional payment from SSO.</p> <p>The arbitrator determined that an appropriate percentage would be eight per cent for SSO employees who stopped SSO work any time up to and including March 31, 2000, and 10 per cent for employees who stopped SSO work on April 1, 2000 or later.? While the PSAC pushed for higher percentages in arbitration, we are pleased that all current and former members entitled to pay equity will quickly receive an additional payment.?</p> <p>Because SSO is responsible for making these additional payments, please direct questions concerning this to SSO at: <a href="mailto:statcan.ssopayequityoesequitesalariale.statcan@canada.ca">statcan.ssopayequityoesequitesalariale.statcan@canada.ca</a></p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/collective-bargaining-branch">Collective Bargaining Branch</a></li></ul></section> Mon, 18 Jun 2018 19:57:29 +0000 calugaj 6865 at/352 ¨¦quit¨¦ salariale : une bataille judiciaire qui pourrait fa?onner la nouvelle loi f¨¦d¨¦rale https://www.google.com//352/node/6772 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>La Cour supr¨ºme du Canada confirme que certaines dispositions de la Loi sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale du Qu¨¦bec renforcent la discrimination salariale, en plus d¡¯¨ºtre inconstitutionnelles.</p> <p>??Cette d¨¦cision indique clairement que les iniquit¨¦s salariales fond¨¦es sur le genre constituent une violation des droits des femmes, prot¨¦g¨¦s par l¡¯article?15 de la Charte des droits et libert¨¦s, affirme le pr¨¦sident national de l¡¯AFPC, Chris Aylward. Le gouvernement f¨¦d¨¦ral devrait s¡¯en inspirer pour r¨¦diger une nouvelle loi proactive en mati¨¨re d¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale.??</p> <p>En 2009, le gouvernement du Qu¨¦bec a modifi¨¦ sa loi sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale pour instaurer un syst¨¨me d¡¯¨¦valuations obligatoires tous les cinq ans visant ¨¤ s¡¯assurer que les employeurs respectent leurs obligations juridiques. Lorsque l¡¯on constate des iniquit¨¦s salariales au cours de la p¨¦riode comprise entre les ¨¦valuations, l¡¯employeur se doit de faire des ajustements salariaux, mais pour l¡¯avenir seulement. Ainsi, il n¡¯est pas tenu de les verser de fa?on r¨¦troactive. La Commission de l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale du Qu¨¦bec ne pouvait donc ordonner le versement r¨¦troactif des ajustements salariaux que lorsque les femmes pouvaient prouver que l¡¯employeur a agi de fa?on arbitraire ou de mauvaise foi.</p> <p>??La loi r¨¦compensait les employeurs en leur permettant de se soustraire ¨¤ leurs obligations en mati¨¨re d¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale et de sous-payer les femmes pendant une p¨¦riode allant jusqu¡¯¨¤ cinq ans??, d¨¦plore le pr¨¦sident Aylward.</p> <p>La Cour supr¨ºme a confirm¨¦ des jugements rendus par des tribunaux de premi¨¨re instance dans les cas o¨´ le refus des paiements r¨¦troactifs a entra?n¨¦ des pertes financi¨¨res importantes pour les femmes et perp¨¦tu¨¦ l¡¯iniquit¨¦ salariale. Dans cette d¨¦cision majoritaire, la Cour souligne que le r¨¦gime instaur¨¦ par cette loi tol¨¦rait la sous-¨¦valuation du travail des femmes. Essentiellement, on disait aux femmes?: vous devez tout simplement vivre avec le fait que vous n¡¯¨ºtes pas pay¨¦es ¨¦quitablement, m¨ºme lorsqu¡¯une ¨¦valuation exig¨¦e par la loi prouve le contraire.</p> <p>Selon la Cour?: ??[¡­] le r¨¦gime, en privil¨¦giant les employeurs, renforce l¡¯un des facteurs?cl¨¦s de l¡¯iniquit¨¦ salariale?: l¡¯in¨¦galit¨¦ du rapport de force entre les employeurs et les travailleuses. En tol¨¦rant les d¨¦cisions des employeurs qui entra?nent des iniquit¨¦s salariales pour les femmes, le l¨¦gislateur envoie le message selon lequel il ferme les yeux sur cette in¨¦galit¨¦ du rapport de force, perp¨¦tuant ainsi davantage le d¨¦savantage.??</p> <p>Plusieurs syndicats qu¨¦b¨¦cois contestaient cette loi. L¡¯AFPC, comme d¡¯autres syndicats de la fonction publique f¨¦d¨¦rale, ainsi que le procureur g¨¦n¨¦ral de l¡¯Ontario ¨¦taient au nombre des parties qui ont ¨¦t¨¦ entendues lorsque l¡¯affaire a ¨¦t¨¦ port¨¦e devant la Cour supr¨ºme.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-embedded-image field-type-image field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Embedded Image:&nbsp;</h2><div class="field-items"><figure class="clearfix field-item even"><img class="image-style-none" src="/352/sites/psac/files/pay_equity.jpg" width="1200" height="627" alt="un homme et une femme ¨¤ l&#039;¨¦chelle" /></figure></div></section><div class="field field-name-field-image-placement field-type-list-text field-label-above view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Image Placement:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even">Top Right Half</div> </div> </div> Fri, 11 May 2018 20:22:08 +0000 calugaj 6772 at/352 Pay equity court case a guide for new federal law https://www.google.com//352/pay-equity-court-case-guide-new-federal-law <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>The Supreme Court of Canada has confirmed that sections in Quebec¡¯s pay equity law reinforce pay discrimination and are unconstitutional.</p> <p>¡°This decision clearly states that pay inequities based on gender are a violation of women¡¯s rights under section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms,¡± said PSAC National President Chris Aylward. ¡°It also provides the federal government with a useful roadmap to drafting a new federal, proactive pay equity law.¡±</p> <p>In 2009, Quebec changed its pay equity law to provide mandatory audits of employers every five years to ensure they were meeting their legal obligations. If it was found that pay inequities had emerged in the five-year period, pay adjustments would be made going forward. However, employers were not required to apply these adjustments retroactively. The province¡¯s pay equity commission could only require retroactivity if women could meet the heavy burden of proving the employer was found to have acted arbitrarily or in bad faith.</p> <p>¡°The law was essentially rewarding employers by allowing them to avoid their pay equity obligations and underpay women workers for up to five years at a time,¡± said Aylward.</p> <p>The Supreme Court upheld lower court judgements in the case that found denying retroactivity meant significant financial losses for women and perpetuated pay inequity. The majority decision pointed out that the law was tolerating the undervaluation of women¡¯s work. Essentially, women were being told they must simply live with the reality that they were not being paid fairly, even when the mandatory audits proved otherwise.</p> <p>According to the Court, ¡°¡­privileging employers reinforces one of the key drivers of pay inequity:? the power imbalance between employers and female workers. By tolerating employer decision-making that results in unfair pay for women, the legislature sends a message condoning that very power imbalance, further perpetuating disadvantage.¡±</p> <p>The law was challenged by a number of Quebec unions. PSAC, a number of other federal public service unions, and the Attorney General of Ontario, were among those who intervened when the case was heard by the Supreme Court.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-embedded-image field-type-image field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Embedded Image:&nbsp;</h2><div class="field-items"><figure class="clearfix field-item even"><img class="image-style-none" src="/352/sites/psac/files/pay_equity.jpg" width="1200" height="627" alt="A man and a woman on a scale" /></figure></div></section><div class="field field-name-field-image-placement field-type-list-text field-label-above view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Image Placement:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even">Top Right Half</div> </div> </div> Fri, 11 May 2018 20:20:17 +0000 calugaj 6771 at/352 Les pressions syndicales rapportent, mais le gouvernement doit en faire plus https://www.google.com//352/node/6586 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>L¡¯Alliance de la Fonction publique du Canada (AFPC) se r¨¦jouit des engagements financiers pris aujourd¡¯hui par le gouvernement f¨¦d¨¦ral en ce qui concerne Ph¨¦nix. Malheureusement, le budget f¨¦d¨¦ral ne pr¨¦voit pas?d¡¯exempter les fonctionnaires de l¡¯obligation de rembourser le montant brut des trop?pay¨¦s.</p> <p>Nos membres ont suivi les instructions du gouvernement et signal¨¦ les sommes trop pay¨¦es avant le 19 janvier. Malgr¨¦ tout, des milliers d¡¯entre eux devront rembourser le montant brut parce que le gouvernement a ¨¦t¨¦ incapable de traiter leur dossier.</p> <p>??Grace aux pressions que nos membres ont exerc¨¦es, le gouvernement ¨¦coute enfin nos revendications, d¨¦clare la pr¨¦sidente nationale de l¡¯AFPC, Robyn Benson. Nous sommes heureux qu¡¯il se soit engag¨¦ ¨¤ embaucher des conseillers et conseill¨¨res en r¨¦mun¨¦ration, mais nous devons veiller ¨¤ ce qu¡¯il tienne ses promesses.??</p> <p>??Nous ne crierons pas victoire tant que nos membres ne seront pas d¨¦dommag¨¦s et qu¡¯ils ne seront pas pay¨¦s correctement et ¨¤ temps.??</p> <h3><strong>Encore du travail ¨¤ faire pour ¨¦liminer les in¨¦galit¨¦s entre les sexes</strong></h3> <p>Il est grand temps que le gouvernement s¡¯engage ¨¤ adopter une loi proactive sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale en?2018.</p> <p>??Si le gouvernement a la ferme intention de s¡¯attaquer aux in¨¦galit¨¦s hommes-femmes, il doit en faire plus, notamment en investissant davantage dans les services de garde d¡¯enfants pour qu¡¯ils soient abordables et de qualit¨¦??, ajoute M<sup>me</sup>?Benson.</p> <p>? Le budget f¨¦d¨¦ral ne pr¨¦voit pas de fonds suppl¨¦mentaires pour am¨¦liorer l¡¯accessibilit¨¦ des services de garde, m¨ºme s¡¯il s¡¯agit du principal obstacle ¨¤ la participation ¨¦gale des femmes au march¨¦ du travail.??</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/child-care">Child care</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/equality-rights">Equality Rights</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/womens-rights">Women&#039;s rights</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/federal-budget">Federal Budget</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/phoenix">Phoenix</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/programs-section">Programs Section</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-embedded-image field-type-image field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Embedded Image:&nbsp;</h2><div class="field-items"><figure class="clearfix field-item even"><img class="image-style-none" src="/352/sites/psac/files/budget_map_croped_0.jpg" width="824" height="431" alt="" /></figure></div></section><div class="field field-name-field-image-placement field-type-list-text field-label-above view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Image Placement:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even">Top Right Half</div> </div> </div> Wed, 28 Feb 2018 02:36:18 +0000 calugaj 6586 at/352 Phoenix pressure yields results; government not off the hook https://www.google.com//352/phoenix-pressure-yields-results-government-not <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>The Public Service Alliance of Canada (PSAC) is encouraged by the funding commitment for Phoenix in this budget. However, the budget does not include an exemption from paying back the gross amount for overpayments in 2017.</p> <p>Our members complied with this government¡¯s instructions to report overpayments by January 19 and yet thousands of members will still need to pay back the gross because of the government¡¯s inability to process their reports.</p> <p>¡°The government is finally listening to our demands thanks to the hard work and pressure from our members,¡± said PSAC National President Robyn Benson. ¡°We are encouraged by the commitment to hiring compensation advisors ¨C but we will need to hold this government¡¯s feet to the fire to ensure they deliver.¡±</p> <p>¡°We will only have a decisive victory when our members are finally made whole, and they¡¯re paid correctly and on time. Until then, the government is not off the hook.¡±</p> <h3><strong>More action needed on gender equality</strong></h3> <p>The government¡¯s commitment to introduce pro-active pay equity legislation in 2018 is long overdue.</p> <p>¡°If this government is truly committed to addressing gender inequality, then they need to go further ¨C we need more investments in affordable, quality child care,¡± said Benson.</p> <p>¡°The federal budget does not include any new funding to increase affordability and accessibility to child care, even though it is the most significant barrier to women¡¯s equal participation in the workforce.¡±</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/child-care">Child care</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/equality-rights">Equality Rights</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/womens-rights">Women&#039;s rights</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/federal-budget">Federal Budget</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/phoenix">Phoenix</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-embedded-image field-type-image field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Embedded Image:&nbsp;</h2><div class="field-items"><figure class="clearfix field-item even"><img class="image-style-none" src="/352/sites/psac/files/budget_map_croped_1.jpg" width="824" height="431" alt="" /></figure></div></section><div class="field field-name-field-image-placement field-type-list-text field-label-above view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Image Placement:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even">Top Right Half</div> </div> </div> Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:46:34 +0000 calugaj 6585 at/352 L¡¯AFPC soumet le diff¨¦rend sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale ¨¤ une tierce partie https://www.google.com//352/node/6368 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Au cours de l¡¯¨¦t¨¦ dernier, l¡¯AFPC a ¨¦t¨¦ inform¨¦e que le calcul du r¨¨glement sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale effectu¨¦ par les Op¨¦rations des enqu¨ºtes statistiques ne tenait pas compte des cong¨¦s pay¨¦s, du taux des heures suppl¨¦mentaires, de la pleine indemnisation des jours f¨¦ri¨¦s et d¡¯autres types d¡¯indemnit¨¦.</p> <p>Du fait qu¡¯ils jugeaient que les paiements re?us comportaient des erreurs, de nombreux membres ont fait appel. L¡¯AFPC a par la suite entam¨¦ des discussions avec l¡¯employeur dans le but de r¨¦soudre ce diff¨¦rend. Malheureusement, les parties n¡¯ont pas r¨¦ussi ¨¤ s¡¯entendre. Rappelons que le r¨¨glement sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale touche de 20 000 ¨¤ 25 000 membres, actuels et anciens, qui ont travaill¨¦ aux OES entre 1985 et 2013. ?</p> <p>Alors que le r¨¨glement sur l¡¯¨¦quit¨¦ salariale visait ¨¤ rem¨¦dier au taux de r¨¦mun¨¦ration discriminatoire vers¨¦ depuis trop longtemps au personnel ¨¤ majorit¨¦ f¨¦minine, l¡¯employeur n¡¯est toujours pas dispos¨¦ ¨¤ lui verser le salaire auquel il a droit, selon l'AFPC. L¡¯AFPC tient ¨¤ rassurer ses membres des OES, tant actuels qu¡¯anciens, qu¡¯elle demeure engager ¨¤ d¨¦fendre ce dossier. C¡¯est pourquoi elle soumettra le diff¨¦rend ¨¤ une tierce partie ind¨¦pendante pour obtenir une d¨¦cision finale et ex¨¦cutoire. Depuis trop longtemps nos membres esp¨¨rent mettre fin ¨¤ cette discrimination salariale et obtenir la r¨¦mun¨¦ration ¨¤ laquelle ils ont droit.?</p> <p>Soulignons qu¡¯entre-temps, Statistique Canada continue de recueillir de l¡¯information et de traiter les versements. Aussit?t qu¡¯une d¨¦cision sera rendue, nous en informerons les personnes concern¨¦es.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section> Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:18:51 +0000 calugaj 6368 at/352 PSAC taking pay equity dispute with SSO to an independent third party https://www.google.com//352/psac-taking-pay-equity-dispute-sso-independent <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>This summer PSAC became aware that Statistical Survey Operations¡¯s (SSO) pay equity settlement calculations failed to include paid leaves, overtimes rates, full compensation for designated paid holidays and other forms of compensation.?</p> <p>After numerous members filed appeals stating that they believed there was an error in the calculations of their payments, PSAC and SSO began discussions to resolve this dispute.? Unfortunately, these discussions have not been able to resolve the pay equity dispute affecting between 20,000 and 25,000 current and former members who worked for SSO between 1985 and 2013.?</p> <p>While the purpose of the pay equity settlement was to remedy a long-standing discriminatory wage rate, SSO is unwilling to pay their female dominated workforce what PSAC feels they are entitled to in the settlement. Rest assured, PSAC will continue to fight for pay equity and is committed to standing up for members and former members.? As a result, PSAC will be taking this dispute to an independent third party for a final and binding decision.?? Our members and former members have waited long enough for their discriminatory wage rate to be adjusted and deserve to be appropriately compensated.</p> <p>In the meantime, Statistics Canada will continue to gather information and process payments. Once a decision has been reached, we will communicate the outcome to all those affected.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sujets/equite-salariale">Pay equity</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/collective-bargaining-branch">Collective Bargaining Branch</a></li></ul></section> Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:16:28 +0000 calugaj 6367 at/352