ทาง เข้า ส โบ เบ็ ต อัพเดท ใหม่_ดูบอลสด ทรูสปอร์ต_ตารางคะแนนบอล https://www.google.com//352/budget-implementation-bill-c4 Bill C-4 takes away the democratic rights of federal public sector employees and seriously undermines the health and safety protections in the Canada Labour Code covering workers under federal jurisdiction. en Le gouvernement abrogera la section 17 de la loi C-4 https://www.google.com//352/node/4785 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Le pr¨¦sident du Conseil du Tr¨¦sor, Scott Brison, a confirm¨¦ aujourd¡¯hui que les lib¨¦raux abrogeront la section 17 de la loi C-4. Ce texte de loi, adopt¨¦ par les conservateurs, bafoue le droit de nos membres ¨¤ la n¨¦gociation collective.</p> <p>? C¡¯est un geste qui vise ¨¤ corriger le tort fait par les conservateurs. Nous entamerons d¡¯autres discussions pour faire en sorte que la ronde de n¨¦gociation se d¨¦roule dans un climat de respect ?, a d¨¦clar¨¦ Robyn Benson, pr¨¦sidente nationale de l¡¯AFPC.</p> <p>? L¡¯AFPC s¡¯¨¦tait prononc¨¦e sur le C-4. Pour nous, c¡¯¨¦tait une attaque contre les droits constitutionnels de nos membres, un affront ¨¤ la d¨¦mocratie. ?</p> <p>? Je tiens ¨¤ remercier nos membres qui ont travaill¨¦ sans relache pour d¨¦noncer cette loi aupr¨¨s des d¨¦put¨¦s. Leur vigilance a port¨¦ fruit ?, a-t-elle conclu.</p> <p>?</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section> Wed, 25 May 2016 22:19:17 +0000 meranis 4785 at/352 Bill C4, division 17 to be repealed https://www.google.com//352/bill-c4-division-17-be-repealed <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>The president of the Treasury Board, Minister Scott Brison today informed PSAC that the Liberals will be repealing the Harper government¡¯s Bill C4, division 17 that restricted our members¡¯ rights to collective bargaining.</p> <p>¡°We recognize this as an attempt to correct some of the harm done by the Conservatives. We are looking forward to further discussions to ensure that this round of bargaining will be conducted in a fair manner,¡± said Robyn Benson, PSAC National President.</p> <p>¡°PSAC has asserted that Bill C4 is an attack on our members¡¯ fundamental charter rights and not consistent with a free and democratic society.¡±</p> <p>¡°Our members worked tirelessly to lobby members of parliament about the injustices of this Bill. I want to thank them for their continued vigilance,¡± concluded Benson.</p> <p>?</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section> Wed, 25 May 2016 22:08:52 +0000 meranis 4784 at/352 Les lois antisyndicales du gouvernement Harper doivent dispara?tre https://www.google.com//352/node/4744 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>La pr¨¦sidente nationale de l¡¯AFPC, Robyn Benson, a demand¨¦ au Comit¨¦ permanent des ressources humaines, du d¨¦veloppement des comp¨¦tences, du d¨¦veloppement social et de la condition des personnes handicap¨¦es de la Chambre des communes d¡¯adopter imm¨¦diatement un projet de loi qui permettrait de r¨¦parer les dommages caus¨¦s par les conservateurs sur le plan des relations de travail.</p> <p>Une fois ses audiences termin¨¦es, le Comit¨¦ soumettra son rapport ¨¤ la Chambre et le projet de loi C-4 passera au vote avant d¡¯¨ºtre envoy¨¦ au S¨¦nat.</p> <h3><strong>Qu¡¯est-ce que le projet de loi?C?4 des lib¨¦raux?</strong></h3> <p>Le projet de loi C?4 modifie trois lois du travail que les conservateurs ont adopt¨¦es (C?525). C¡¯est le meilleur moyen d¡¯¨¦liminer les obstacles aux droits d¡¯association et de n¨¦gociation collective des travailleurs. C?4 permettra ¨¦galement d¡¯abroger la loi C?377, une autre loi antisyndicale.</p> <h3><strong>Loi?C-525</strong></h3> <ul><li>Rend plus difficile pour tous les fonctionnaires l¡¯exercice de leurs droits, comme celui de se syndiquer et de conserver leur adh¨¦sion syndicale.</li> <li>¨¦limine le syst¨¨me qui permet aux syndicats f¨¦d¨¦raux ayant recueilli un nombre suffisant de cartes d¡¯adh¨¦sion syndicale d¡¯obtenir un certificat d¡¯accr¨¦ditation aupr¨¨s d¡¯une commission des relations de travail.</li> <li>Force les commissions des relations de travail ¨¤ tenir un scrutin, m¨ºme apr¨¨s qu¡¯une nette majorit¨¦ d¡¯employ¨¦s a choisi son camp.</li> <li>La longue dur¨¦e du processus de vote donne plus de temps ¨¤ l¡¯employeur pour intimider les personnes qui souhaiteraient appuyer le syndicat.</li> </ul><h3><strong>Loi?C-377</strong></h3> <p>Le projet de loi C-377 imposait de nouveaux rapports financiers r¨¦barbatifs pour toutes les organisations syndicales en modifiant la Loi de l¡¯imp?t sur le revenu.</p> <p>Au m¨ºme titre que les gouvernements provinciaux et les sp¨¦cialistes de la protection de la vie priv¨¦e, entre autres, l¡¯AFPC estime que la loi C?377?:</p> <ul><li>pose un probl¨¨me de constitutionnalit¨¦;</li> <li>contrevient aux lois f¨¦d¨¦rales et provinciales sur la protection de la vie priv¨¦e;</li> <li>cr¨¦e des r¨¨gles inutiles;</li> <li>ne procure aucun avantage aux travailleurs syndiqu¨¦s ni aux contribuables.</li> </ul><p>Le m¨¦moire que l¡¯AFPC a pr¨¦sent¨¦ au Comit¨¦ sera bient?t disponible en ligne.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/bill-c-377">Bill C-377</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/bill-c-525">Bill C-525</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/unionization">Unionization</a></li></ul></section> Thu, 05 May 2016 18:23:28 +0000 bretonv 4744 at/352 Harper government¡¯s anti-union laws must be reversed https://www.google.com//352/harper-governments-anti-union-laws-must-be <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>PSAC National President Robyn Benson has asked the House of Commons Human Resources, Skills, Social development and Status of Persons with Disabilities Committee to approve without delay a government bill that would undo at least some of the damage done to labour relations by the previous Conservative government.</p> <p>After the committee concludes its hearings and reports back to the House of Commons, the Liberal¡¯s C-4 will be submitted for a vote and then proceed to the Senate.</p> <h3><strong>What is the Liberal¡¯s Bill C4?</strong></h3> <p>Bill C-4 will essentially repeal Bill C-525 and Bill C-377, two of the Harper government¡¯s anti-union laws.</p> <h3><strong>Bill C-525</strong></h3> <ul><li>Made it more difficult for all federal workers to exercise their legal right to unionize and remain unionized</li> <li>Eliminated the card-check system that allowed federal labour boards to certify unions if a specified majority of employees in a workplace signed union cards</li> <li>Forces boards to conduct a vote even where a clear majority of employees have made their choice</li> <li>Allows more time for employers to intimidate employees against supporting their union due to the time it takes to hold a vote in every case.</li> </ul><h3><strong>Bill C-377</strong></h3> <p>Bill C-377 imposed new and onerous financial reporting requirements on all labour organizations in Canada by amending the Income Tax Act.</p> <p>PSAC¡¯s position, also raised by provincial governments, privacy experts and others is that C-377 is:</p> <ul><li>Constitutionally unsound</li> <li>Contravenes federal and provincial privacy statues and laws</li> <li>Creates unnecessary regulations</li> <li>Provides no benefit to union members or taxpayers</li> </ul><p>PSAC¡¯s brief sent to the committee will be available online soon.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/unionization">Unionization</a></li></ul></section> Thu, 05 May 2016 18:15:24 +0000 bretonv 4743 at/352 N¨¦gociations avec le Conseil du Tr¨¦sor : nouveau gouvernement, ancien mandat https://www.google.com//352/node/4499 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Nos ¨¦quipes de n¨¦gociation se sont assises ¨¤ la table avec le Conseil du Tr¨¦sor pour la premi¨¨re fois depuis l¡¯accession au pouvoir des lib¨¦raux.</p> <p>Les revendications qu¡¯elles ont pr¨¦sent¨¦es sont le reflet des pr¨¦occupations des membres. Notre but demeure la n¨¦gociation d¡¯une convention collective ¨¦quitable.</p> <p>Durant la campagne, les lib¨¦raux ont fait miroiter la possibilit¨¦ d¡¯un nouveau mandat de n¨¦gociation. Pourtant, les propositions mises de l¡¯avant par l¡¯employeur sentent le r¨¦chauff¨¦.?</p> <h3><strong>Pas question de toucher ¨¤ nos cong¨¦s de maladie</strong></h3> <p>En effet, la proposition pr¨¦sent¨¦e par les n¨¦gociateurs du Conseil du Tr¨¦sor ressemblait ¨¤ s¡¯y m¨¦prendre ¨¤ celle du gouvernement conservateur. Il s¡¯agit, encore une fois, de remplacer notre r¨¦gime actuel de cong¨¦s de maladie par un r¨¦gime d¡¯invalidit¨¦ de courte dur¨¦e beaucoup moins avantageux pour nos membres, qui perdront leurs acquis. Il s¡¯agirait d¡¯un r¨¦gime non n¨¦goci¨¦ que le gouvernement pourrait modifier ¨¤ son gr¨¦.</p> <p>Nous sommes ouverts ¨¤ l¡¯am¨¦lioration du r¨¦gime de cong¨¦s de maladie, pour autant que nous n¡¯ayons pas ¨¤ faire de concessions ¨¤ la table de n¨¦gociation et que nos membres n¡¯aient pas ¨¤ choisir entre ne pas ¨ºtre pay¨¦s et travailler malade.</p> <h3><strong>La n¨¦gociation de bonne foi et la loi?C-4</strong></h3> <p>Nous sommes heureux de constater que le gouvernement compte abroger <a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/gouvernement-abrogera-section-20-du-projet-loi-c?_ga=1.260164175.354340724.1447357840">la section 20 de la loi C-59</a>. Toutefois, nous nous devons de lui rappeler l¡¯existence d¡¯une autre loi injuste, la <a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/loi-execution-budget-c4">C-4</a>. Les changements inconstitutionnels qu¡¯elle a apport¨¦s au processus de n¨¦gociation collective demeurent pr¨¦occupants.?</p> <p>Pourquoi ces dispositions de la C-4 sont-elles encore en vigueur apr¨¨s le jugement sans ¨¦quivoque rendu par la Cour supr¨ºme dans l¡¯affaire de la F¨¦d¨¦ration du travail de la Saskatchewan? La question se pose. Nous continuerons ¨¤ contester les lois devant les tribunaux et ¨¤ favoriser la tenue de n¨¦gociations libres et justes.</p> <p>¨¤ la table, l¡¯AFPC revendiquera l¡¯am¨¦lioration de la prestation et de la qualit¨¦ des services publics, et des milieux de travail sains et efficaces pour les fonctionnaires f¨¦d¨¦raux. La population canadienne tout enti¨¨re en sortira gagnante.</p> <ul><li><strong>Groupe EB?</strong>: Nous avons mis l¡¯accent sur la taille des classes et sur le suivi des recommandations d¨¦coulant de l¡¯enqu¨ºte sur la r¨¦mun¨¦ration. <strong><em>Info?: </em></strong><a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/eb">syndicatafpc.ca/eb</a>.<br /> ?</li> <li><strong>FB?</strong>: Nous avons revendiqu¨¦ la protection des postes d¡¯agent qui pourraient ¨ºtre ¨¦limin¨¦s ¨¤ cause du virage technologique. Nous avons aussi exig¨¦ le maintien des semaines de travail comprim¨¦es et la protection des horaires de travail contre les changements unilat¨¦raux apport¨¦s par les gestionnaires. <strong><em>Info?: </em></strong><a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/fb">syndicatafpc.ca/fb</a>.</li> </ul><ul><li><strong>PA?: </strong>Nos revendications portaient principalement sur les conditions de travail dans les centres de services et la n¨¦cessit¨¦ d¡¯adopter des normes minimales pour ces milieux de travail. Notre ¨¦quipe a aussi soulign¨¦ l¡¯importance de reconna?tre l¡¯anciennet¨¦ lors de l¡¯¨¦tablissement des horaires de travail. <strong><em>Info?: </em></strong><a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/pa">syndicatafpc.ca/pa</a>.<br /> ?</li> <li><strong>SV?</strong>: Notre sous-comit¨¦ des ¨¦quipages de navire a mis la derni¨¨re main aux revendications que nous pr¨¦senterons lors de la prochaine s¨¦ance de n¨¦gociation. <strong><em>Info?:</em></strong> <a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/sv">syndicatafpc.ca/sv</a>.</li> </ul><ul><li><strong>TC?:</strong> Nous avons discut¨¦ de la n¨¦cessit¨¦ de mieux prot¨¦ger la sant¨¦ et la s¨¦curit¨¦ du personnel et de supprimer enti¨¨rement le libell¨¦ discriminatoire. Il y avait aussi ¨¤ l¡¯ordre du jour les heures de travail et l¡¯augmentation du nombre de prestations en reconnaissance de la nature particuli¨¨re du difficile travail que font nos membres. <strong><em>Info?: </em></strong><a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/tc">syndicatafpc.ca/tc</a>.</li> </ul></div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/bargaining">Bargaining</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sick-leave">Sick leave</a></li></ul></section> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:41:07 +0000 bedardc 4499 at/352 Treasury Board bargaining: new government, old mandate https://www.google.com//352/treasury-board-bargaining-new-government-old <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Treasury Board bargaining teams met this week for the first time since the election of the new Liberal government.</p> <p>We brought forward proposals addressing the needs that were identified by the membership and continue to work toward achieving a fair collective agreement.</p> <p>Given the Liberals¡¯ election promises, we expected this government to bring forward a new bargaining mandate. In fact there was little indication of a change in approach.?</p> <h3><strong>We will not trade away sick leave</strong></h3> <p>Treasury Board negotiators tabled a proposal similar to that of the previous Conservative government, that would replace our existing sick leave plan. It takes away existing rights and leaves members worse off. The proposed short term disability plan would fall outside of the collective agreement and allow the government to make unilateral changes any time.</p> <p>We remain open to improvements on sick leave but we will not negotiate concessions or agree to any proposal that forces members to choose between losing pay or going to work sick.</p> <h3><strong>Fair bargaining and Bill C4</strong></h3> <p>We are pleased to see the government move to repeal <a href="/352/government-confirms-repeal-c-59-division-20-psac">Bill C59</a> (division 20), but there is still another unfair labour law on the books. The unconstitutional changes to labour laws governing the collective bargaining process <a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">under C4</a> remain a key issue.?</p> <p>It is a mystery why the government is not repealing this legislation in light of the clear pronouncements made by the Supreme Court in the Saskatchewan Federation of Labour case. We will continue to move forward with our litigation and take all necessary steps to ensure that there is free and fair collective bargaining for the federal public service.</p> <p>At the bargaining table, PSAC will continue to focus on measures to improve the delivery and quality of public services and make the federal public service an efficient and healthy place to work. This benefits all Canadians.</p> <ul><li><strong>EB</strong>: Our team focused on the issue of class sizes and making sure that our recommendations about the pay study are recognized and followed. <strong><em>For more info: </em></strong><a href="/352/eb"><strong><em>psacunion.ca/eb</em></strong></a>.<br /> ?</li> <li><strong>FB</strong>: We put forward proposals to protect against the elimination of officer positions due to the introduction of technological change. The team also sought to protect compressed work weeks and prevent management from making unilateral changes to schedules. <strong><em>For more info: </em></strong><a href="/352/fb"><strong><em>psacunion.ca/fb</em></strong></a><strong><em>.</em></strong></li> </ul><ul><li><strong>PA: </strong>We focused on working conditions in contact centres and the need to implement minimum standards in these workplaces. Our team also emphasized the importance of implementing shift scheduling by seniority. <strong><em>For more info: </em></strong><a href="/352/pa"><strong><em>psacunion.ca/pa</em></strong></a><strong><em>.</em></strong><br /> ?</li> <li><strong>SV</strong>: Our ship¡¯s crew subcommittee finalized the proposals that we will bring to the next round of bargaining. <strong><em>For more info:</em></strong> <a href="/352/sv"><strong><em>psacunion.ca/sv</em></strong></a>.</li> </ul><ul><li><strong>TC</strong>: Discussions focused on the need to better protect health and safety and to expand the definition of ¡°family,¡± to remove discriminatory language. The team discussed hours of work, and the need to provide more allowances that recognize the unique and difficult nature of TC members¡¯ work. <strong><em>For more info: </em></strong><a href="/352/tc"><strong><em>psacunion.ca/tc</em></strong></a><strong><em>.</em></strong></li> </ul></div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/bargaining">Bargaining</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/sick-leave">Sick leave</a></li></ul></section> Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:37:02 +0000 bedardc 4498 at/352 8 choses que vous devez savoir ¨¤ propos du projet de loi C-4 https://www.google.com//352/node/4479 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><ol><li> <h3>La sant¨¦ et la s¨¦curit¨¦</h3> <p>La loi?C-4 a priv¨¦ les fonctionnaires f¨¦d¨¦raux de leurs droits d¨¦mocratiques et porte gravement atteinte aux dispositions du <em>Code canadien du travail</em> portant sur la sant¨¦ et la s¨¦curit¨¦ des travailleurs et travailleuses relevant du f¨¦d¨¦ral.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Un poste essentiel</h3> <p>L¡¯employeur a le droit absolu de d¨¦terminer ce qui constitue un service et un poste essentiels.</p> </li> <li> <h3>R¨¨glement des diff¨¦rends</h3> <p>Les fonctionnaires ne peuvent plus choisir entre les trois modes de r¨¨glement des diff¨¦rends, soit la conciliation, la gr¨¨ve ou l¡¯arbitrage.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Les conseils d¡¯arbitrage</h3> <p>Les conseils d¡¯arbitrage ne sont plus ind¨¦pendants.</p> </li> <li> <h3>La r¨¦mun¨¦ration</h3> <p>La loi a ¨¦limin¨¦ l¡¯analyse de la r¨¦mun¨¦ration et les services de recherche, qui comptaient parmi les fonctions cl¨¦s de la Commission des relations de travail dans la fonction publique.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Les travailleurs mis ¨¤ pied</h3> <p>La loi?C-4 limite les droits des travailleurs mis ¨¤ pied et a modifi¨¦ la d¨¦finition de ??danger?? pour inclure uniquement les risques ??imminents??.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Les agents de sant¨¦ et s¨¦curit¨¦</h3> <p>Tous les pouvoirs et comp¨¦tences des agents de sant¨¦ et s¨¦curit¨¦ sont maintenant plac¨¦s avec le ministre.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Discrimination</h3> <p>Les fonctionnaires ne peuvent plus porter plainte pour discrimination aupr¨¨s de la?Commission canadienne des droits de la personne.</p> <p>?</p> </li> </ol></div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-employers field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Employers:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/employer/treasury-board">Treasury Board</a></li></ul></section><div class="field field-name-field-publication-date field-type-datestamp field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Publication Date:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><span class="date-display-single">Monday, February 1, 2016 - 1:30pm</span></div> </div> </div> Mon, 01 Feb 2016 21:42:51 +0000 cmisener 4479 at/352 Eight things you need to know about Bill C-4 https://www.google.com//352/eight-things-you-need-know-about-bill-c-4 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><ol><li> <h3>Health and Safety</h3> <p>Bill C-4 took away the democratic rights of federal public sector employees and seriously undermines the health and safety protections in the <em>Canada Labour Code </em>covering workers under federal jurisdiction.?</p> </li> <li> <h3>Essential Services</h3> <p>The employer has the unfettered right to determine what constitutes an essential service and which workers perform essential services.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Dispute Resolution</h3> <p>Public sector workers are no longer able to choose their dispute resolution process - conciliation/strike or arbitration.?</p> </li> <li> <h3>Arbitration</h3> <p>Arbitration boards are no longer independent.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Compensation</h3> <p>Compensation analysis and research services, which were key functions of the Public Service Labour Relations Board, have been eliminated.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Laid off workers</h3> <p>This bill means fewer rights for laid off workers and?changed?the definition of ¡°danger¡± to only include ¡°imminent¡± risks.</p> </li> <li> <h3>Health and Safety Officers</h3> <p>All authority and powers of Health and Safety Officers has?been?placed with the Minister.?</p> </li> <li> <h3>Discrimination</h3> <p>The law prevents public service employees from filing discrimination complaints with the Canadian Human Rights Commission.</p> <p>?</p> </li> </ol></div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-employers field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Employers:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/employer/treasury-board">Treasury Board</a></li></ul></section><div class="field field-name-field-publication-date field-type-datestamp field-label-inline clearfix view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-label">Publication Date:&nbsp;</div> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><span class="date-display-single">Monday, February 1, 2016 - 1:30pm</span></div> </div> </div> Mon, 01 Feb 2016 18:48:26 +0000 cmisener 4473 at/352 Le gouvernement abrogera la section 20 du projet de loi C-59, mais l¡¯AFPC veut aussi faire abolir des sections de la loi C-4 https://www.google.com//352/node/4447 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>En r¨¦ponse ¨¤ une lettre urgente envoy¨¦e par Robyn Benson, la dirigeante principale des ressources humaines du Conseil du Tr¨¦sor, Anne-Marie Smart, a confirm¨¦ tard la semaine derni¨¨re que le gouvernement du Canada?comptait abroger la section 20?du <a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/syndicats-font-monter-pression-defendre" target="_blank">projet de loi C-59</a>. Entre-temps, le gouvernement affirme qu¡¯il n¡¯imposera pas de r¨¦gime de gestion des cong¨¦s d¡¯invalidit¨¦ et de maladie en vertu des pouvoirs que lui conf¨¨re ce projet de loi.</p> <p>L¡¯AFPC se r¨¦jouit de cette nouvelle, mais s¡¯inqui¨¨te vivement du fait que le gouvernement lib¨¦ral n¡¯a pas pris l¡¯engagement d¡¯abroger aussi des sections du <a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/loi-execution-budget-c4" target="_blank">projet de loi </a><a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/loi-execution-budget-c4?_ga=1.189888107.1751903845.1453132490">C-4</a> pr¨¦sent¨¦ par les conservateurs.</p> <p>La loi C-4 mine le droit de n¨¦gociation collective des fonctionnaires f¨¦d¨¦raux, y compris le droit de gr¨¨ve, en plus de donner aux n¨¦gociateurs du gouvernement un avantage indu ¨¤ la table de n¨¦gociation. ?</p> <p>¨¤ ce jour, le pr¨¦sident du Conseil du Tr¨¦sor, Scott Brison, s¡¯est seulement engag¨¦ ¨¤ consulter les partenaires de la fonction publique au sujet du projet de loi C-4. ?</p> <p>L¡¯AFPC a pr¨¦sent¨¦ une requ¨ºte devant les tribunaux concernant le caract¨¨re inconstitutionnel du projet de loi C-4, mais demande au gouvernement de r¨¦gler lui-m¨ºme le probl¨¨me au lieu de d¨¦penser l¡¯argent des contribuables dans un litige co?teux.</p> <p>L¡¯AFPC demande au gouvernement de n¨¦gocier de bonne foi et de collaborer ¨¤ l¡¯obtention d¡¯une convention collective qui saura renforcer les services publics pour l¡¯ensemble des Canadiens.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/bargaining">Bargaining</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/programs-section">Programs Section</a></li></ul></section> Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:30:50 +0000 choquej 4447 at/352 Government confirms repeal of C-59 division 20, PSAC still pushing on Bill C-4 https://www.google.com//352/government-confirms-repeal-c-59-division-20-psac <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Late last week, in response to urgent correspondence from National President Robyn Benson, the Chief Human Resources Officer for Treasury Board Anne-Marie Smart, confirmed in writing that the Government of Canada?intends to repeal Division 20?of?<a href="/352/federal-public-service-unions-take-further-steps" target="_blank">Bill C-59</a>.?</p> <p>In the interim, the Government says it will not exercise the powers given to it by the Bill to unilaterally implement a disability and sick leave management system.?</p> <p>The PSAC welcomes this news but is deeply?concerned that the federal Liberal government has not made a similar commitment with respect to repealing the changes made to labour law by the previous Conservative government¡¯s <a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4" target="_blank">Bill C-4</a>.?</p> <p>Bill C-4 undermines the constitutional rights of federal public service employees to collective bargaining, including the right to strike. It also gives government negotiators an unfair advantage at the bargaining table. ?</p> <p>To date, Treasury Board President Scott Brison has committed only to engage in consultations on Bill C-4 with "public sector partners." ?</p> <p>PSAC is challenging the constitutionality of Bill C-4 in the courts but wants the Government of Canada to fix the problem itself rather than spend citizens' money on costly litigation. ?</p> <p>The PSAC is also calling on the government to engage in fair collective bargaining and work with us to achieve a collective agreement that will strengthen public services for all Canadians.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/bargaining">Bargaining</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/budget-implementation-bill-c4">Bill C-4</a></li></ul></section><section class="field field-name-field-publisher field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Publisher:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/publisher/communications-and-political-action">Communications and Political Action</a></li></ul></section> Mon, 25 Jan 2016 18:26:01 +0000 choquej 4446 at/352