คาสิโนออนไลน์ _การ พนัน ออนไลน์ ฝาก ขั้น ต่ำ 100_มอบเครดิตให้ลูกค้า https://www.google.com//352/law-enforcement The general topic covering policing and the criminal justice system as it applies to the federal government: the RCMP, Corrections Canada etc. en D¨¦cision historique de la Cour f¨¦d¨¦rale : la violence au travail doit faire l¡¯objet d¡¯enqu¨ºtes rigoureuses https://www.google.com//352/node/4354 <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>Le 30 novembre 2015, la Cour f¨¦d¨¦rale d¡¯appel a rendu un jugement sans pr¨¦c¨¦dent en d¨¦clarant que les employeurs ne pouvaient arbitrairement d¨¦cider ce qui constitue un acte de violence au travail.</p> <p>??Cette d¨¦cision est historique pour la fonction publique f¨¦d¨¦rale et tous les employ¨¦s r¨¦gis par la r¨¦glementation f¨¦d¨¦rale, souligne Bob Kingston, pr¨¦sident du Syndicat de l¡¯Agriculture. Elle stipule que le harc¨¨lement psychologique au travail peut, avec le temps, constituer une des pires formes de violence au travail.??</p> <p>??Compte tenu des conclusions du r¨¦cent <a href="http://syndicatafpc.ca/sondage-aupres-fonctionnaires-harcelement-impact">Sondage aupr¨¨s des fonctionnaires</a>, selon lesquelles une personne salari¨¦e sur cinq dans la fonction publique a ¨¦t¨¦ victime de harc¨¨lement, cette r¨¦cente d¨¦cision de la Cour d¡¯appel arrive ¨¤ point, ajoute Robyn Benson, pr¨¦sidente nationale de l¡¯AFPC. Les travailleuses et les travailleurs qui d¨¦noncent la violence au travail ont droit d¡¯¨ºtre entendus et respect¨¦s.???</p> <h2>Plainte d¡¯un membre de l¡¯AFPC</h2> <p>La plainte ¨¤ l¡¯origine de ces d¨¦marches a ¨¦t¨¦ d¨¦pos¨¦e par Abel Akon, un inspecteur de l¡¯ACIA de Saskatoon et membre de l¡¯AFPC. Dans sa plainte, M.?Akon d¨¦non?ait le harc¨¨lement et l¡¯humiliation dont il avait ¨¦t¨¦ victime de la part de son superviseur.</p> <p>Apr¨¨s que son employeur a rejet¨¦ sa plainte, M.?Akon a obtenu l¡¯aide de l¡¯AFPC. Ensemble ils ont fait valoir qu¡¯en agissant ainsi l¡¯ACIA avait viol¨¦ une disposition du <em>Code canadien du travail</em>. Le Tribunal de sant¨¦ et s¨¦curit¨¦ au travail Canada a par la suite soutenu la position de l¡¯employeur et c¡¯est ainsi que l¡¯AFPC a port¨¦ l¡¯affaire devant la Cour f¨¦d¨¦rale.</p> <h2>Contr?le judiciaire?: L¡¯AFPC gagne sa cause</h2> <p>L¡¯AFPC a d¨¦pos¨¦ une demande de contr?le judiciaire et, en novembre?2014, la Cour f¨¦d¨¦rale a statu¨¦ que le traitement dont faisait l¡¯objet M.?Akon constituait de la violence au travail.</p> <p>Le juge de la Cour f¨¦d¨¦rale, Michael Manson, a indiqu¨¦ que l¡¯intimidation psychologique peut, avec le temps, ¨ºtre l¡¯une des pires formes de pr¨¦judice qu¡¯on puisse infliger ¨¤ une personne. Il allait ainsi ¨¤ l¡¯encontre de la position du gouvernement qui soutenait que la violence au travail se limite ¨¤ l¡¯usage de la force physique.</p> <h2>Enqu¨ºte impartiale</h2> <p>Dans sa d¨¦cision, la Cour f¨¦d¨¦rale d¡¯appel a soutenu le raisonnement du juge Manson.</p> <p>Autre fait important?: la Cour a d¨¦cr¨¦t¨¦ que les employeurs n¡¯avaient pas la comp¨¦tence pour mener eux-m¨ºmes des enqu¨ºtes de cette nature. Elle a ajout¨¦ qu¡¯une telle pratique ne ferait que tourner en d¨¦rision les m¨¦canismes de r¨¦glementation et annulerait unilat¨¦ralement le droit des employ¨¦s ¨¤ une enqu¨ºte impartiale de leurs plaintes.</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/bullying">Workplace bullying</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/harassment">Harassment</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/law-enforcement">Law enforcement</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/mental-health">Mental health</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/violence">Violence</a></li></ul></section> Sat, 05 Dec 2015 00:07:10 +0000 bedardc 4354 at/352 Federal court rules in PSAC¡¯s favour, affirms workplace violence merits serious investigation https://www.google.com//352/federal-court-rules-psacs-favour-affirms-workplace <div class="field field-name-body field-type-text-with-summary field-label-hidden view-mode-rss"> <div class="field-items"> <div class="field-item even"><p>In a <a href="http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/federal-employers-cant-unilaterally-decide-whether-harassment-constitutes-workplace-violence-court-confirms">groundbreaking decision</a>, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled on November 30 that employers cannot arbitrarily decide what constitutes <a href="/352/topics/bullying">workplace violence</a>.</p> <p>¡°The decision is ground breaking for the federal public service and all federally regulated workers,¡± said Bob Kingston, President of the Agriculture Union. ¡°It establishes that psychological harassment can amount to workplace violence and is one of the worst forms of harm that can be inflicted over time.¡±</p> <p>¡°In the context of the recent <a href="/352/government-employee-survey-shows-harassment-impact">public service employee survey</a> where one in five workers report being harassed in the public service, this decision is very timely,¡± added Robyn Benson, PSAC National President. ¡°Employees alleging workplace violence deserve to have their concerns treated fairly and respectfully.¡±?</p> <h2>PSAC member files complaint</h2> <p>The case involved a workplace violence complaint filed by Abel Akon, a CFIA poultry inspector in Saskatoon and a member of PSAC. The complaint described the harassment and humiliation he suffered from his supervisor.</p> <p>After the employer dismissed the complaint, PSAC supported Akon in asserting that CFIA management had violated a regulation of the Canada Labour Code. The case landed in court after the Occupational Health and Safety Tribunal of Canada endorsed the employer¡¯s position.</p> <h2>PSAC wins judicial review</h2> <p>PSAC filed an application for judicial review. In November 2014, the federal court ruled that the way that Akon was treated did constitute workplace violence.</p> <p>¡°Psychological bullying can be one of the worst forms of harm that can be inflicted on a person over time,¡± wrote Judge Michael Manson. This was in contrast to the government¡¯s position that workplace violence only involves physical force.</p> <h2>Impartial investigation</h2> <p>The Federal Court of Appeal agreed with Justice Manson¡¯s reasoning in its decision this week.</p> <p>It was also significant that the court agreed that employers should not be allowed to conduct their own investigations in to workplace violence, saying this ¡°would make a mockery of the regulatory scheme and effectively nullify the employees¡¯ right to an impartial investigation of their complaints.¡±</p> </div> </div> </div> <section class="field field-name-field-topics field-type-taxonomy-term-reference field-label-above view-mode-rss"><h2 class="field-label">Topics:&nbsp;</h2><ul class="field-items"><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/bullying">Workplace bullying</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/harassment">Harassment</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/law-enforcement">Law enforcement</a></li><li class="field-item odd"><a href="/352/topics/mental-health">Mental health</a></li><li class="field-item even"><a href="/352/topics/violence">Violence</a></li></ul></section> Fri, 04 Dec 2015 21:47:35 +0000 bedardc 4351 at/352